Bidder Reviews for Valkyrie Historical Auctions (188)

I will reiterate what we’ve explained to you several times already. There was no dishonesty whatsoever in regards to your situation. Due to an auction clerking error the item was sold on two different platforms. You lost the bid by $10. At first we thought that the item was put in another persons order by mistake and we informed you of this and apologized immediately. You were told the item was lost and that it was our fault, and that if we were able to track it down we would let you know. Your money was refunded immediately. Two weeks later we discovered the true error and informed you of what had actually happened. Nobody lied to you, ever. It was an unfortunate error and took us some time to discover the exact circumstances of what happened. After the auction things are very chaotic and sometimes these rare mistakes take time to investigate. The only reasonable complaint you have here is that it took us a bit of time to figure everything out. You claim we lied about the auction platforms automatically generating invoices after the auction. Like I explained to you previously, this is not a lie and is the reason it’s very easy for the same item to be invoiced twice after an auction clerking error. Cross referencing each individual invoice after an auction makes no sense because it’s such a rare error and is also not realistic based on the amount of time this would take. I repeat, you were never waiting on us to give you your money back and our initial explanation of what happened to the item in no way put the blame on anyone but us. So where is the dishonesty you speak of? The simple answer is that it doesn’t exist. You lost the auction for this particular item and we’ve showed you the winner’s invoice proving that you were not the high bidder. I understand the disappointment but it’s extremely childish for you to flat out lie about the circumstances of what actually happened.